- Published on: Oct 09, 2025
- 3 minute read
- By: Secondmedic Expert
Telemedicine Policy Updates In India 2025: What Changed And Why It Matters
Telemedicine went from “nice to have” to essential during COVID-19. India’s first clear move - the Telemedicine Practice Guidelines (March 2020) - established how registered medical practitioners (RMPs) could consult remotely. Five years later (2025), the legal foundation remains the same, but the policy conversation has matured: the emphasis has shifted from emergency enablement to quality, scale and trustworthy digital-health integration. esanjeevani.mohfw.gov.in
Here’s what’s changed in practice during 2024–25 and what clinicians, health platforms, hospitals and patients need to know.
1) From permission to performance: measurable quality & assessment
Early telemedicine policy focused on what was allowed (who can practice, consent, prescribing). In 2024–25 the focus broadened to how well telemedicine is delivered. New research and tools - for example the Indian Telemedicine Assessment Scale (I-TASC) - provide standardized ways to assess usability, safety, and clinical appropriateness of teleconsult platforms and assisted telemedicine workflows. That matters because regulators and procurement bodies increasingly ask for documented quality metrics before contracting services. Lippincott Journals
Practical takeaway: platforms should prepare for periodic quality audits, implement clinician workflow checklists, and collect user-experience and outcome metrics.
2) eSanjeevani & national program learnings: operational standards
eSanjeevani remains India’s flagship public tele-OPD platform; recent program reports and the NHSRC telemedicine final report capture real-world lessons on scale, workforce training, connectivity limits, and SOPs needed for long-term operations. Those operational standards are being shared as best practices for state health departments and private providers. If you run tele-OPDs, expect guidance on staffing ratios, digital triage, documentation norms and escalation protocols. National Health Systems Resource Centre+1
Practical takeaway: align your tele-OPD SOPs with eSanjeevani/ NHMSC templates to improve interoperability and eligibility for public-private collaborations.
3) Data governance, consent & NDHE alignment
A major 2024–25 theme is better alignment between telemedicine practice and the National Digital Health Ecosystem (NDHE)/ABDM constructs. While the 2020 guidelines mentioned documentation and privacy, recent policy work is spelling out expectations for consent capture, audit trails, and reasonable security practices under the IT Act and NDHM frameworks. Independent telemedicine reviews and telehealth regulation reports have recommended clearer platform accountability for data handling and logging. Intelehealth+1
Practical takeaway: ensure digital consent flows are auditable, integrate ABHA (health ID) where available, and document security measures in vendor contracts.
4) Clinical scope, prescribing and hybrid care models
Clinical scope guidance remains - some scenarios still require in-person exams - but 2025 policy nudges encourage hybrid models: tele-triage + local diagnostics + in-person escalation when needed. Clinicians are expected to document limitations of remote exams and use remote monitoring or local tests to support decision-making. These pragmatic, workflow-level updates reduce risk and improve patient outcomes. esanjeevani.mohfw.gov.in
Practical takeaway: adopt tele-triage protocols, use home/lab testing partnerships, and always document reasoned clinical judgment when physical exam is limited.
5) Workforce readiness & clinician adoption
Post-2020 the conversation often cited clinician reluctance as a barrier. In 2024–25, training programs, CME modules, and professional society toolkits have increased clinician readiness - and studies show greater comfort among doctors using telemedicine for follow-ups and chronic disease management. Telemedicine adoption is now less about permission and more about clinical workflow redesign. ScienceDirect
Practical takeaway: doctors should complete recommended telemedicine training modules and keep teleconsult records tidy - these are fast becoming minimum professional expectations.
6) Equity & rural access remain central
Policy updates also stress that telemedicine shouldn’t widen disparities. Program reports emphasise assisted telemedicine (health-worker facilitated consults), low-bandwidth solutions, and mobile outreach to bring telemedicine to rural clinics and railway hospitals - practical steps already piloted in several states. The Times of India+1
Practical takeaway: design low-bandwidth workflows and options for caregiver-assisted consultations to reach underserved populations.
Conclusion - what this means for you
By 2025 India’s telemedicine policy picture is no longer just “can you do it?” but “do it well, safely and equitably.” Keep following the 2020 Guidelines for the legal baseline; prepare for platform audits and quality assessment (I-TASC), align records and consent with NDHE/ABHA expectations, and embed hybrid care pathways that combine remote consults with local diagnostics and clear escalation rules. These steps will improve safety, trust and sustainability for telemedicine across India. esanjeevani.mohfw.gov.in+2Lippincott Journals+2
Useful Links & Reports (official / high-quality)
-
Telemedicine Practice Guidelines (MoHFW / eSanjeevani) (2020) - official guideline PDF. esanjeevani.mohfw.gov.in
https://esanjeevani.mohfw.gov.in/assets/guidelines/Telemedicine_Practice_Guidelines.pdf -
Telemedicine Final Report (NHSRC / eSanjeevani) - 2025 - program lessons & operational guidance. National Health Systems Resource Centre
https://www.nhsrcindia.org/sites/default/files/2025-09/Telemedicine Final Report 2025.pdf -
Indian Telemedicine Assessment Scale (I-TASC) - 2025 study - assessment tool for telemedicine usability and outcomes. Lippincott Journals
Telemedicine regulation & practice reviews (InteleHealth/Global reports) - data governance & code of practice recommendations. Intelehealth
Read FAQs
A. The 2020 Guidelines remain the legal foundation, but 2024–25 policy work has focused on operationalising them: national program reports, quality assessment tools and clearer data-governance expectations rather than a wholesale rewrite.
A. Regulators and expert bodies now emphasise measurable quality (e.g., tools like I-TASC), better integration with the National Digital Health Ecosystem (NDHE/ABDM), and stricter expectations on consent, record-keeping and security.
A. Yes — eSanjeevani continues to be the government flagship for public tele-OPDs, and recent national reports describe expansion, standard operating procedures, and lessons for scale.
A. Policy discussion in 2024–25 pushed tighter alignment with the IT Act/NDHM privacy constructs: clearer consent flows, audit trails, and platform accountability — platforms must demonstrate reasonable security practices.
A. Follow the Telemedicine Practice Guidelines (patient ID, consent, documentation), complete platform-specific training where offered, adopt I-TASC / quality checklists when available, and integrate teleconsult records with patient EHRs (ABDM IDs) where possible.
Our Services
Request A Callback
Recent Posts
Seasonal Flu vs COVID-19: Indian Perspective
Oct 07,2025